Long Island Abundant Life Church 長島豐盛生命教會
  • Home
  • About Us 關於教會
    • Mission Statement - 使命宣言
    • Statement of Faith - 信仰立場
    • Biblical Marriage - 合乎聖經的婚姻
    • Church Leadership - 教會同工
    • Directions - 路線圖
    • Documents - 表格與文件下載
    • Contact Us - 聯絡我們
    • Ministry openings
  • Chinese Ministry 華語事工
    • 崇拜
    • 講道集 >
      • 主日信息
      • 特會 / 講座
    • 主日學
    • 門訓小組 >
      • 門訓小組介紹
    • 團契
    • 讀經
  • English Ministry 英文事工
  • Youth 少年事工
    • Worship
    • Sunday School
    • Youth Fellowship
    • Events
    • Our Vision
    • Connect with Us
    • Parent Resources
    • Youth Prayer Requests
  • Children's Ministry 兒童事工
    • Children's Worship - 兒童崇拜 >
      • Children's Songs - 歌曲
      • Junior Worship, Archive - 學習內容
      • Junior Worship, Current - 學習內容
      • Preschool Worship, Archive - 幼兒崇拜
    • Sunday School - 主日學 >
      • Preschool - 低年級
      • Middlers, Current - 高年級
      • Elementary, Archive - 高年級
    • VBS-特别暑期聖經班 >
      • EVENTS- 特別活動
    • Nursery - 幼兒照顧
    • Resources - 資源
  • Missions/Evangelism 宣教/佈道
    • Global Mission 全球宣教
    • Missions Ministry 宣教事工
  • Chinese School 中文學校
  • Church Activities / News / Calendar 教會活動 / 消息 / 行事曆
    • Special/urgent 特別/緊急
    • Calendar 教會行事曆
    • Bulletin 週報
    • Archive 檔案 >
      • Pray for Hindus 2018 為印度人禱告
      • Seek God 2019 尋求神
      • Misc. 其他
  • Chinese Student Ministry 学生事工
    • Campus Ministry 校园事工
    • CSF 衣
    • CSF 食
    • CSF 住
    • CSF 行
  • Links 资源鏈接
  Long Island Abundant Life Church 長島豐盛生命教會

John 11:45–12:8

6/7/2012

 
Click here to read today's passage on Bible Gateway.

Before we begin today, a HUGE thank you to my beautiful wife, Rachel.  Her final Seminar in Bible research paper in college was on the harmony we're talking about today, and she provided A LOT of help to me on this post.  Hooray Rachel!

Anointing Jesus
You may remember the post from the end of Luke dealing with the different resurrection accounts.  Today we have another "harmonizing" issue to deal with as we examine the story of Mary anointing Jesus' feet.

Stories of Jesus being anointed by women are in all four Gospel.  You can find them in Matthew 26:6-13, Mark 14:3-9, Luke 7:36-38, and our passage today, John 12:1-8.

The passages in Matthew and Mark are nearly word-for-word identical, so I'm not going to reproduce both of them here. Here's the stories from Mark, Luke, and John for comparison:
Mark 14:3-9
3And while he was at Bethany in the house of Simon the leper, as he was reclining at table, a woman came with an alabaster flask of ointment of pure nard, very costly, and she broke the flask and poured it over his head. 4There were some who said to themselves indignantly, “Why was the ointment wasted like that? 5For this ointment could have been sold for more than three hundred denarii and given to the poor.” And they scolded her. 6But Jesus said, “Leave her alone. Why do you trouble her? She has done a beautiful thing to me. 7For you always have the poor with you, and whenever you want, you can do good for them. But you will not always have me. 8She has done what she could; she has anointed my body beforehand for burial. 9And truly, I say to you, wherever the gospel is proclaimed in the whole world, what she has done will be told in memory of her.”
John 12:2–8
2So they gave a dinner for him there. Martha served, and Lazarus was one of those reclining with him at table. 3 Mary therefore took a pound of expensive ointment made from pure nard, and anointed the feet of Jesus and wiped his feet with her hair. The house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. 4But Judas Iscariot, one of his disciples (he who was about to betray him), said, 5“Why was this ointment not sold for three hundred denarii and given to the poor?” 6He said this, not because he cared about the poor, but because he was a thief, and having charge of the moneybag he used to help himself to what was put into it. 7Jesus said, “Leave her alone, so that she may keep it for the day of my burial. 8For the poor you always have with you, but you do not always have me.”


Luke 7:36-38, 50
36 One of the Pharisees asked him to eat with him, and he went into the Pharisee’s house and reclined at the table. 37 And behold, a woman of the city, who was a sinner, when she learned that he was reclining at table in the Pharisee’s house, brought an alabaster flask of ointment, 38 and standing behind him at his feet, weeping, she began to wet his feet with her tears and wiped them with the hair of her head and kissed his feet and anointed them with the ointment...

...50 And he said to the woman, “Your faith has saved you; go in peace.”



The first thing that I would like to call attention to is that Luke is drastically different than Mark and John:  In Luke the setting is "a Pharisee's house".  The non-Luke accounts specify that this happens in Bethany.  The woman is identified as "a sinful woman", which comes into play later in the story.  The woman in Luke anoints Jesus with perfume and tears, wiping His feet with her hair, but the response is different.  In the Matthew/Mark/John accounts, the argument over what happens is about how this is a waste of money; in Luke it is about the fact that Jesus is being touched by a sinful woman.  He then forgives her sin, which is totally different than in the other accounts.  Lastly, (and important for what I am about to say), the timing is different.  In the non-Luke accounts, this event is placed just before Passover, leading up to Passion Week, when Jesus will die.  The Lukan account occurs much earlier. 

The solution:  there are two anointings.  The anointing by the "sinful woman" in Luke occurs first chronologically, and the anointings recorded in the other three Gospels are the same.  We know from other passages that Mary is very devoted to Jesus, so I don't think it's out of line to think that it's possibly Mary heard about this previous anointing and, worried about Jesus and the violence rising up against Him, mimics this act as a show of her devotion.

So - that handles the Luke issue, but there are still a few more things to deal with regarding the other "Mary" anointing.  As I said before, Matthew and Mark are so close that I'll just list Mark for brevity's sake.  Here's a comparison of the major points of the Matthew/Mark and John passages:

Mark 14:3–9
Bethany
two days before Passover
house of Simon the leper
a woman
[x]
alabaster jar
breaks jar
“expensive [polytelos] perfume”
genuine nard
anoints Jesus’ head
[x]
disciples angry
value: more than 300 denarii
Jesus defends the woman
“Leave her alone”
“Poor always with you”
Jesus anointed for burial
reported to the whole world

John 12:1–11
Bethany
six days before Passover
[house of Martha???]
Mary
a pound
[x]
[x]
“expensive [politimos] perfume”
genuine nard
anoints Jesus’ feet
wipes Jesus’ feet with her hair
Judas angry
value: 300 denarii
Jesus defends Mary
“Leave her alone”
“Poor always with you”
[x]
[x]     [1]
For the most part:

"These parallels are extensive and the major differences really only work to supplement one another. The chief contextual difference is that Mark and Matthew record the anointing following the triumphal entry, whereas John records it before. However, Synoptic chronologies are often fluid. Mark also says that Jesus’ head was anointed (John refers to feet). Most of the other details can be easily integrated to create a consistent picture. For instance, the “pound” of ointment mentioned by John would be too much for Jesus’ feet. Even though Mark explains that Jesus’ head was anointed, Jesus later says that his body was anointed (Mark 14:8). Therefore Mary likely took this large amount of perfume and liberally placed it on Jesus, only drying his feet with her hair." [2]
(emphasis mine; we talked about the sometimes-differing chronology of John in our post about the cleansing of the temple.  This is a similar case.)

Even dealing with the chronology of how this event fits in with the Triumphal Entry, we're left with one last "time" problem:  Mark says this occurs 2 days before passover, while John says six.  What's going on?

"John can be harmonized with the Synoptic chronology, making the onset of Passover Thursday night (hence the meal recorded in chapter 13 is indeed a Passover meal). This means that Jesus arrives in Bethany six days before the next Thursday evening (remembering that Jewish days start just after dusk), which is to say that he arrives late on Friday just as Sabbath begins. The meal described in 12:2 may refer to a meal on Saturday evening (following the close of Sabbath), since by then word of Jesus’ arrival would have spread through the village and people would be free to travel. On the following day (12:12) Jesus enters Jerusalem in triumph." [3]

In other words, Jesus ARRIVES in Bethany six days before Passover, but this meal doesn't take place until later.  John doesn't record the change of days, but the important part for him is when Jesus arrived in Bethany.

The final issue is location:  where were they when this happened?  This is actually easier than it appears.  The chart above lists "Martha's house???" for the John passage, but there is actually no location provided beyond "in Bethany".  We should assume that the story in John's Gospel therefore takes place in Simon's house, just as the Matthew/Mark account does.  The accounts complement one another, giving details that the other leaves out, painting a much fuller picture for us.  Who is Simon?  That's a harder question.  There have been a couple of theories on this:

1. Simon is the father of Lazarus, Mary, and Martha.
2. Since Simon is a "leper", he would not live in the village anymore, so perhaps this refers to the house the USED to be Simon's, now inhabited by Lazarus, Mary, and Martha.

It's hard to know on this one - the problem among other things is that "Simon" was a very popular name during this time, making it hard to know who exactly is being talked about (probably why "the leper" is amended to his name: to differentiate him from other "Simons").

In the end, things actually work out nicely and logically, but it DOES involve some work and thinking.  To summarize:
  • Two anointings: a sinful woman as recorded in Luke and Mary as recorded in Matthew, Mark, and John.
  • It is likely Mary heard about the act of the sinful woman and seeks to express her devotion to Jesus in the same way.
  • Mary anoints Jesus 2 days before Passover, several days after Jesus arrives in Bethany.
  • John places Mary's anointing in a slightly different place chronologically.  We have already observed this Johannine practice earlier in the book.
  • The anointing by Mary occurs in Simon the leper's house with Mary, Martha, Lazarus, and the disciples (and probably more) present.
So there you have it!  I know the past few days have been more "academic", but thanks for sticking with me through it.  Hard work and study is worth it as we seek to understand God's Word better! 

Questions? Comments?

[1] Gary M. Burge, NIV Application Commentary: John (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 2000), 337.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Ibid, 337-338.

Josiah
6/7/2012 02:01:54 pm

I had no idea that the same thing could happen twice with just about the same reaction. I wonder if anyone else has an experience like that.

Greg
6/8/2012 04:32:42 am

I think the key here is that it ISN'T the same reaction. Mary copies the previous woman's show of devotion, but the response to it is different. The first time it is "This sinful woman shouldn't touch Jesus" and the second time with Mary is is "What a waste of money!" That's the evidence that we're not talking about the same event - it's definitely similar, but there is too much different about the events to think that Luke and Matthew/Mark/John are talking about the same event.

Andrei
6/7/2012 04:53:15 pm

Wow a lot of stuff here; so many pieces to be harmonized. Interesting to read and see the arguments and explanations for making things fit.

Greg
6/8/2012 04:35:59 am

Yeah - the hard part is that truthfully, things weren't "planned" to fit. I don't think that the Gospel writers were thinking "I wonder if this contradicts what Luke is writing?" when they were writing their own Gospels. That's why this can be so difficult: different ways of counting days, people having several nicknames....all kinds of stuff. But being true, there is a way to harmonize things - it's just hard to know sometimes if HOW you are harmonizing it is right. This was my (and Rachel's) best shot at it and I think it makes sense and is responsible with the information we have.

Andrei
6/7/2012 04:55:20 pm

Oh, and a question: I was really curious about Caiaphas. What's up with him prophesying that Jesus would die for the nation? What's up with him telling the Pharisees that they don't know what they're talking about? Is he a bad guy or a good guy?

Greg
6/8/2012 04:48:54 am

It's difficult because people are complex. I think that we can certainly say that generically Caiaphas is a bad guy that sides against Jesus, but that doesn't mean he does nothing but sit in his evil lair, laugh maniacally, and plot against all happiness in the world (kind of like this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaPSYOhBRik&fmt=18). He was the high priest of God and no doubt did a decent job at it. His prophecy kind of reminds me of Saul in 1 Samuel 19:24 - another guy that wasn't great, but prophecies as well. The fact is that Caiaphas' prophecy was true. Because of this prophecy and his desire to fulfill it, salvation came to the whole world. Caiaphas makes his choices, but he is a tool in God's plan. We know he was a person that set his sights against the very Son of God, therefore performing evil actions, so I guess that's enough to say he was a "bad guy".


Comments are closed.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.