Long Island Abundant Life Church 長島豐盛生命教會
  • Home
  • About Us 關於教會
    • Mission Statement - 使命宣言
    • Statement of Faith - 信仰立場
    • Biblical Marriage - 合乎聖經的婚姻
    • Church Leadership - 教會同工
    • Directions - 路線圖
    • Documents - 表格與文件下載
    • Contact Us - 聯絡我們
    • Ministry openings
  • Chinese Ministry 華語事工
    • 崇拜
    • 講道集 >
      • 主日信息
      • 特會 / 講座
    • 主日學
    • 門訓小組 >
      • 門訓小組介紹
    • 團契
    • 讀經
  • English Ministry 英文事工
  • Youth 少年事工
    • Worship
    • Sunday School
    • Youth Fellowship
    • Events
    • Our Vision
    • Connect with Us
    • Parent Resources
    • Youth Prayer Requests
  • Children's Ministry 兒童事工
    • Children's Worship - 兒童崇拜 >
      • Children's Songs - 歌曲
      • Junior Worship, Archive - 學習內容
      • Junior Worship, Current - 學習內容
      • Preschool Worship, Archive - 幼兒崇拜
    • Sunday School - 主日學 >
      • Preschool - 低年級
      • Middlers, Current - 高年級
      • Elementary, Archive - 高年級
    • VBS-特别暑期聖經班 >
      • EVENTS- 特別活動
    • Nursery - 幼兒照顧
    • Resources - 資源
  • Missions/Evangelism 宣教/佈道
    • Global Mission 全球宣教
    • Missions Ministry 宣教事工
  • Chinese School 中文學校
  • Church Activities / News / Calendar 教會活動 / 消息 / 行事曆
    • Special/urgent 特別/緊急
    • Calendar 教會行事曆
    • Bulletin 週報
    • Archive 檔案 >
      • Pray for Hindus 2018 為印度人禱告
      • Seek God 2019 尋求神
      • Misc. 其他
  • Chinese Student Ministry 学生事工
    • Campus Ministry 校园事工
    • CSF 衣
    • CSF 食
    • CSF 住
    • CSF 行
  • Links 资源鏈接
  Long Island Abundant Life Church 長島豐盛生命教會

Luke 16:18–17:10

4/25/2012

 
Click here to read today's passage on Bible Gateway.

The Rich Man and Lazarus
Interesting "story" today.  I phrase it like that because one of the big debates about this passage is whether it should be classified as a parable or as a true story.  This is the only parable in which the characters are actually named, leading some to believe that it is a true story rather than a parable.

"An important feature often discussed about this passage is whether it truly is a parable. Some avoid identifying it as a parable for fear that it removes the precision about the teaching on the afterlife, since a parable is more pictorial and representative than a real story. However, the fundamental theological affirmations about the afterlife—for example, that once one receives his or her judgment, one cannot alter that position for eternity—are true regardless of the genre classification.
    The story does differ from other parables in not being about a repeatable everyday situation, but rather is a specific story. In this sense it is like the parable of the good Samaritan. Still, the account does not recount a historical interchange between a specific rich man and a specific Lazarus, but pictures it. The details of the discussion in the afterlife, including the rich man’s ability to engage Abraham in discussion, are apocalyptic-like features in the account that show its rhetorical, parabolic, and symbolic character. Yet realities about accountability before God are portrayed." [1]

I know that's kind of a dense quote, but basically what he's saying is that there are some good reasons to think that this is a parable and other good reasons to think that it's a true story.  Bock definitely leans toward "parable".  I myself lean toward "true story".  The fact that this is the only "parable" that the characters have names is a pretty big factor, as well as the fact that the interactions and way the story is told is very different from most of the parables.  That's definitely not an opinion I would die over, but that's how I see it. Admittedly the conversation with Abraham is really unusual and brings up a lot of questions, but we just don't have enough data to really understand what's going on in that interaction clearly.  Above all I think it would be VERY unwise to build our entire theology of the afterlife on this passage because a lot of things are unclear.

This story is really a testament to how hard the human heart can become.  Though this story is mixed in with a lot of other content, I think it's pretty reasonable to think that it's directed at the Pharisees that don't believe in Jesus.  There are many today who are just like them:  their hearts have become so hard that no matter what is revealed to them they will reject it.  They ask for signs from God of His existence and reject every sign they receive.  It breaks my heart.

"Even if one rises from the dead, they will still not be convinced! Those reading the parable in the Gospel, knowing the story of Jesus, are aware just how true this remark is. Jesus’ resurrection convinced only some that God was working through him. A hard heart produces eyes that do not see the activity of God and ears that do not heed his warnings, much less the revelation he graciously reveals. The parable closes with a dark and tragic note about how humanity often misses the opportunities God makes available to them." [2]

[1] Darrell L. Bock, The NIV Application Commentary: Luke (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing House, 1996), 432.
[2] Ibid. 434.
Andrei
4/25/2012 07:50:29 pm

It's scary to see how absolute the heaven/hell dichotomy is. The rich man has lost all opportunities for comfort; he receives zero solace where he is at.

When you mention the debate between it being 'a true story' or 'parable', I was wondering if/how these distinctions would affect what we should take from it?

Also, if it is a 'true story', wouldn't that mean that its depiction of the afterlife would be theologically accurate?

Greg
4/26/2012 03:25:39 am

It definitely makes a difference. If it's a parable, most people wouldn't take what is said to be making any sort of real statement about what the afterlife is like: it would just be a story used to make a point. If it's a true story, that means that it IS making a statement about what the afterlife is like. Although things are perhaps unclear, we CAN take what is picture here to be true. As I said in the post, it's a hard distinction...there are good reasons to believe either way.

So...to answer your final question: yes. It would be theologically accurate if it's a true story. As I also said above though, we probably shouldn't base all of our beliefs about the afterlife on this passage since that's not actually the purpose and point of the story. We need to let our knowledge about heaven and hell be shaped by the whole of the Bible. There are also some issues here concerning if/how this is talking about "the intermediate heaven" and those kinds of things (I'm thinking that Andrew covered some of that in Sunday School when you were talking about Heaven). Definitely an interesting and important discussion to have, but this isn't really the best format for it - it should probably be covered in a class or something.


Comments are closed.

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.